MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2727265767 · doi:10.1061/9780784480779.190

Discontinuous Galerkin Method in Modeling Materials with Micro-Cracks

2017· article· en· W2727265767 on OpenAlex
Quriaky Gomez, Ioan R. Ionescu, Oana Ciobanu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNumerical methods in engineering
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscretizationGalerkin methodHomogenization (climate)BrittlenessMaterials scienceNonlinear systemAmplitudeBoundary value problemDiscontinuous Galerkin methodWave propagationMechanicsFinite element methodMathematical analysisPhysicsComposite materialMathematicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyze wave propagation in heterogeneous brittle materials modeled by a linear elastic body with micro-cracks. The problem is nonlinear due to the boundary conditions on the cracks, such as non-penetration and friction. A numerical upscaling homogenization technique and a discontinuous Galerkin space discretization method are applied to find the effective properties of the damaged material. The wave propagation (speed, amplitude and pulse length) of micro-cracked materials in configurations of varying complexity is studied. While theoretical and numerical wave velocities are found to be very close for small values of the crack density parameter, large values exhibit remarkable differences. Furthermore, we observe that amplitude and speed of the transmitted (damaged) wave are affected by its length when it is close to the length of the micro-cracks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score0.698

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNumerical methods in engineeringFrench-language works237,207