MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2727324167 · doi:10.3169/itej.69.510

4. The Processing and Integration of 3D Depth Signals in the Human Visual Cortex Revealed by fMRI and TMS

2015· article· en· W2727324167 on OpenAlexaff
Hiroshi Ban, Dorita H. F. Chang, Andrew E. Welchman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of The Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicVisual perception and processing mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisual cortexPsychologyNeuroscienceCortex (anatomy)Computer scienceCognitive psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

物体同士の大小関係・重なり, パースペクティブといった手掛かりからも豊かな立体構造 を知覚できることがわかっているが,それら 2 次元の 「絵 画的」 な情報からヒトがどのように立体を再構成している のかは研究が充分に進んでいない.また,複数の奥行き手 掛かりをヒト脳がどのように統合しているのかに関しても 明確な仕組みは明らかになっていなかった. 本稿では,ヒト脳内の 3 次元視覚情報処理経路について 概説しながら,筆者らの研究グループが最近発表した 「両 眼視差奥行き知覚に関わるヒト脳内の二つの処理経路とそ

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of The Institute of Image Information and Television EngineersSame topicVisual perception and processing mechanismsFrench-language works237,207