MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Relationship between physical activity and cardiovascular disease risk factors in cancer survivors.

2016· article· en· W2727639205 on OpenAlexaff
Dong‐Woo Kang, Kerry S. Courneya

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Wellbeing Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNational Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyBlood pressureInternal medicineRisk factorPopulationCancerLogistic regressionEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e13067 Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is one of the most prevalent comorbidities among cancer survivors. Physical activity has been well established to positively control CVD risk factors in the general population. In this study, we investigated the association between physical activity and CVD risk factors in cancer survivors. Methods: Data from the 2007-2014 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) were analyzed. Of the total sample from the survey, a total of 1,596 cancer survivors were included for data analysis. CVD risk factors included total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), fasting glucose (FG), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and triglycerides (TG). A high risk level associated with each factor was defined according to the Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III guidelines. Physical activity was calculated on the basis of the total minutes spent in moderate and vigorous physical activity per week. Complex sample logistic regression analyses were used to identify whether there was a difference in CVD risks between physical activity groups. Results: Of a total of 1,596 subjects, 36.4% were men, mean age was 61.4±12.7, and mean BMI was 23.4±3.3. 48.8% of respondents were completely inactive (0 min/wk.), 22.0% were insufficiently active ( < 150 min/wk.), and 29.3% met the ACSM/ACS physical activity guidelines ( ≥ 150 min/wk.). Among CVD risk factors, the risks of low HDL-C (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.52 – 0.94), high SBP (OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.44 – 0.76) and high TG (OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.48 – 0.89) were lower for those who met the physical activity guidelines compared to those who were completely inactive, after adjustment for age, sex, and body mass index. Furthermore, the OR for having two or more CVD risk factors was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.39 – 0.77). Conclusions: Meeting the physical activity guidelines ( ≥ 150 min/wk.) may mitigate CVD risk factors, and thereby reduce the risk that cancer survivors will develop.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.393
GPT teacher head0.613
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicHealth and Wellbeing Research→French-language works237,207→