Stochastic Heat Kernel Estimation on Sampled Manifolds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The heat kernel is a fundamental geometric object associated to every Riemannian manifold, used across applications in computer vision, graphics, and machine learning. In this article, we propose a novel computational approach to estimating the heat kernel of a statistically sampled manifold (e.g. meshes or point clouds), using its representation as the transition density function of Brownian motion on the manifold. Our approach first constructs a set of local approximations to the manifold via moving least squares. We then simulate Brownian motion on the manifold by stochastic numerical integration of the associated Ito diffusion system. By accumulating a number of these trajectories, a kernel density estimation method can then be used to approximate the transition density function of the diffusion process, which is equivalent to the heat kernel. We analyse our algorithm on the 2‐sphere, as well as on shapes in 3D. Our approach is readily parallelizable and can handle manifold samples of large size as well as surfaces of high co‐dimension, since all the computations are local. We relate our method to the standard approaches in diffusion geometry and discuss directions for future work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".