MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2727821467 · doi:10.1017/s1551929517000608

Did Life Begin Soon After the Earth Formed?

2017· article· en· W2727821467 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephen W. Carmichael

Bibliographic record

VenueMicroscopy Today · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEarth Systems and Cosmic Evolution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAstrobiologyEarth (classical element)GeologyPhysicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are no confirmed microfossils older than 3,500 million years (Myr) on Earth. Recently Mathew Dodd, Dominic Papineau, Tor Grenne, John Slack, Martin Rittner, Franco Pirajno, Jonathan O’Neil, and Crispin Little may have identified evidence of microbial life on Earth from at least 3,770 Myr ago or perhaps as long ago as 4,280 Myr [1]. This would be relatively near the accepted time that the Earth was formed about 4,567 Myr ago! Microfossils that have biosignatures are considered evidence of early life. These take the form of tubes, knobs, filaments, and/or branching filaments that are likely biogenic. They are similar to younger microfossils in the same kinds of jasper rocks as well as to modern iron-oxidizing bacteria, and they are not the product of any known non-biologic chemical reactions. Dodd et al. pointed out that modern forms of these are known to form at hydrothermal vents on the ocean floor, and therefore life may have begun in a similar environment. A candidate location is a region in northern Québec, Canada, known as the Nuvvuagittuq Supracrustal Belt (NSB) that represents a fragment of the Earth’s primitive ocean floor with pillows of lava and where the metamorphosed remains of hydrothermal vents may be preserved as highly localized iron-rich carbonate rocks. Samples from the NSB were examined by light microscopy (transmitted and reflected) as well as scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in back-scattered electron and secondary electron imaging modes. Other microscopy methods were correlated to analyze mineral targets including laser scanning confocal micro-Raman spectroscopy, electron probe micro-analysis, focused ion beam milling, and laser ablation inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry. To assess the biogenicity of the NSB putative microfossils, Dodd et al. considered if the microscopic structures they found could have possibly been formed by abiogenic mechanisms. Considering their structures as twisted iron-containing filaments with microscopic dimensions, identical to younger microfossils and modern bacteria, and their attachment to tubes (Figure 1) and terminal knobs, they concluded that their observations could not be explained by any known single or combined abiogenic pathway. Many filaments and tubes were also found inside concretions of jasper, similar to younger fossils of marine animals found in limestone. Of particular note is the presence of carbonate rosettes, 50 to 200 µm in diameter, which typically contained microscopic inclusions of carbonaceous material and apatite. Similar modern rosettes with concentrically layered minerals are attributed to mineralized bacteria, although those structures are most likely abiogenic but require biomass to form through chemically oscillating reactions. In fact, rosettes and slightly larger granules from the NSB contain phosphorus (an element vital in biology) in apatite within the carbonate rosettes, which suggests a biologic origin. This conclusion, along with the occurrence of microfossils nearby some structures, indicates an origin involving micro-organisms in the Nuvvuagittuq seafloor more than 3,700 Myr ago. Haematite (containing ferric oxide) tubes from the NSB hydrothermal vent deposits. Photo credit: Matthew Dodd. If these conclusions are supported by future studies from this laboratory and others, then they will have a profound impact on the search for life on other planets. Dodd and his mentor Papineau suggest that ancient submarine-hydrothermal vents should be viewed as increasingly likely sites for origins of life on Earth, as well as primary targets in the search for extraterrestrial life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.008
Scholarly communication0.0030.009
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicroscopy TodaySame topicEarth Systems and Cosmic EvolutionFrench-language works237,207