MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2727968119 · doi:10.46269/5216.175

Belo Monte et la continuation du projet colonial en Amazonie

2017· article· fr· W2727968119 on OpenAlexaff
Yussef Suleiman Kahwage

Bibliographic record

VenueÁskesis - Revista des discentes do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociologia da UFSCar · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWater Governance and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article se penche sur la construction du barrage Belo Monte sur le fleuve Xingu en Amazonie brésilienne, et sur les intérêts autour de ce projet. Le projet Belo Monte est analysé du point de vue de la continuation des relations coloniales entre l'État-nation brésilien et les peuples autochtones de la région amazonienne. Avec des outils d'interprétation des relations coloniales tels que le consensus des matières premières, le colonialisme interne et le mythe du terra nullius, nous présentons un aperçu des contradictions politiques à l'origine de l'expansion portugaise et brésilienne en Amazonie, et suggérons la persistance d'une structure politique coloniale à la base sur du projet Belo Monte.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.499
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0100.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÁskesis - Revista des discentes do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociologia da UFSCarSame topicWater Governance and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207