MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Development of Intelligent GNSS-based Land Vehicle Localisation Systems

2015· dissertation· en· W2728025007 on OpenAlex
Federico Grasso Toro

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigitale Bibliothek Braunschweig (Verbundzentrale Göttingen (VZG)) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAlberta Agricultural Research Institute
KeywordsGNSS applicationsComputer scienceGlobal Positioning SystemTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The usage of Global Navigation Satellites Systems (GNSS) for localisation purposes demands a permanent evaluation of the position information provided for the receiver, as well as a standardised GNSS-Receivers validation methodology and subsequently quality control procedures oriented to land vehicles within the ergodic hypothesis. The use of an independent reference system should provide enough information to validate the localisation system, but the lack of proper evaluation and procedures presents significant blind spots for future applications in both the GNSS-Receiver and the correspondent reference system. To solve these problems an approach based on artificial intelligence (AI) is presented. Also the development of an advanced filter technique for positioning estimation results in significant improvements of the reference system, even allowing a standalone GNSSdependent reference system when no independent systems are available. The presented developments are the bases for future intelligent GNSS-based localisation systems. The methodologies combine the advanced Particle Filter (PF) for positioning estimation with the newly developed Mahalanobis Ellipses Filter (MEF) methodology for accuracy-based data evaluation and the Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) models for both quantitative and qualitative validation. In this thesis the bases of the intelligent GNSS-based localisation system are presented and developed follows the BMW principle. In German the BMW principle stands for Beschreibungsmittel (means of description), Methode (methods) and Werkzeug (tool). The resulting system described along the thesis is applied and tested in a demonstrator tool, validating the developed methodologies in both software and hardware level. The proposed methodologies for the development of an intelligent GNSS-based localisation system are a substantial contribution for intelligent GNSS-based validation tools that will enable future safety-relevant applications, in field such as on-board uncertainty evaluation of vehicle localisation; advanced driver assistance systems; and GNSS-based vehicle localisation with intelligent maps for track selective enabled-localisation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.532
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it