MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2728548804 · doi:10.15353/cjds.v6i2.350

École, handicap et francophonie: comment pallier les inégalités au sein d’un groupe minoritaire?

2017· article· fr· W2728548804 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Nathalie Bélanger, Mona Paré, Marie-Ève Gagné

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Disability Studies · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCollaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le cas de certains groupes d’élèves, en l’occurrence ceux en situation de handicap sévère ou à grands besoins et issus des communautés francophones en situation minoritaire (CFSM), apparaît préoccupant. Plusieurs droits qui interviennent dans ce cadre-ci sont rappelés : le droit linguistique des minorités, le droit à l’éducation des élèves en situation de handicap et le droit aux services de soins de santé dans les milieux scolaires. Les auteures privilégient un angle qui emprunte aux études sur les rapports de minorisation fondés sur divers attributs et aux approches de la complexité. D’abord, les cadres normatifs et les pratiques en matière d’offre et de planification de services en vigueur en Ontario, plus particulièrement à Ottawa, sont examinés puis comparés à d’autres que l’on trouve ailleurs au Canada et dans le monde, là où se trouvent des minorités nationales, linguistiques ou ethniques. Les résultats de l’analyse de la littérature sur le sujet montrent qu’une offre active permet d’atténuer les difficultés auxquelles les familles font face dans leur quête de services et de soins pour leurs enfants. Un autre thème récurrent dans la littérature concerne la participation des familles et des communautés aux soins et à l’éducation.The case of certain groups of students, in this case those with severe disabilities or with great needs, and coming from Francophone minority communities, appears worrisome. A multitude of overlapping and intersecting rights are explored in this context: minority language rights, the right to education of pupils with disabilities and the right to health care services in schools. The authors draw on a perspective borrowed from studies of minorization based on diverse attributes and approaches of complexity. First, the normative frameworks and practical implementation and planning of services offered in Ontario, particularly in Ottawa, are examined and then compared with others found elsewhere in Canada and around the world, where national, linguistic or ethnic minorities are present. The results of the literature review show that an active offer helps to alleviate the difficulties families face in their quest for services and care for their children. Another recurring theme in the literature concerns the involvement of families and communities in care and education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.565

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.010
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Disability StudiesSame topicCollaborative Teaching and InclusionFrench-language works237,207