MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2728722607 · doi:10.4000/africanistes.3998

Chanter et dire l’identité. Les ambivalences identitaires des Maale évangéliques de 1960 à nos jours

2014· article· fr· W2728722607 on OpenAlexaff
Hugo Ferran

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal des africanistes · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican history and culture analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La transnationalisation musicale des mouvements évangéliques soulève des problèmes identitaires qu’il convient d’analyser à l’échelle locale. Chez les Maale du Sud-ouest éthiopien, dont il est question ici, l’évangélisation protestante a débuté dans les années 1960, sous l’impulsion de missionnaires wolayta, leurs voisins du Nord. Les premiers Maale convertis au protestantisme se sont appropriés l’hymnologie wolayta avant de créer leurs propres hymnes, les Maale zamuro. Si les zamuro des années 1960 se distinguent réellement des musiques « traditionnelles », les Maale évangéliques ont progressivement « ethnicisé » leur hymnologie. Bien qu’ils aient conscience de cette évolution, les Évangéliques soutiennent que leurs « musiques croyantes » (amano zamuro) se sont toujours différenciées des « musiques terrestres » (alamo kotso) des Traditionalistes. La mise en regard des discours des musiciens et des résultats de l’analyse musicale révèle les ambivalences identitaires des Maale évangéliques des années 1960 à aujourd’hui.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.009
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal des africanistesSame topicAfrican history and culture analysisFrench-language works237,207