MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2728821938

Service Extraction from Business Process Model: An Ontology-Based Approach.

2016· article· en· W2728821938 on OpenAlexaff
Abderrahmane Leshob, Hafedh Mili

Bibliographic record

VenueCOMPSAC Workshops · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBusiness Process Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness Process Model and NotationBusiness process modelingBusiness processComputer scienceArtifact-centric business process modelBusiness process managementProcess managementService (business)Business ruleOntologyProcess modelingSoftware engineeringBridge (graph theory)Process (computing)Knowledge managementBusinessWork in process
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In nowadays organizations, electronic services are used as the cornerstones for automating business processes. However, it is difficult to derive such services from business process models. This paper aims to bridge the gap between the business processes of the organizations and the service-based software applications that support them. It proposes a novel model driven development method that automatically generates detailed electronic services from the specification of business processes expressed in BPMN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCOMPSAC WorkshopsSame topicBusiness Process Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207