Approche atypique avec Les Muses de Montreal: radicaliser la place des artistes handicapes au Quebec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les Muses est une école située à Montréal offrant l’un des seuls programmes de formation professionnelle au Canada pour les artistes ayant un handicap intellectuel. Durant l'hiver et le printemps 2015, j'ai travaillé avec Les Muses pour explorer la complexité de leur formation créative, en particulier comment les différences cognitives et physiques sont prises en charge et valorisées dans la salle de classe. Mon intérêt pour ce processus était double: a) comprendre de quelles manières le handicap était présenté comme étant esthétiquement productif, et b) le genre de legs artistiques que les étudiants de Les Muses laissent dans le monde des arts de la scène québécois. En utilisant mon travail sur le terrain, cet article porte sut l’«approche atypique » soit la manière dont Les Muses utilise le handicap comme un outil créatif et significatif dans la classe pour s'assurer que tous les élèves participent au maximum et de la manière artistique la plus stimulante possible. J’ai choisi le mot «atypique» pour refléter le mouvement actuel au Québec qui reconnaît la valeur artistique importante des artistes non conventionnels que sont ceux et celles qui ont des différences cognitives et physiques. Les Muses, located in Montréal, Québec, is one of Canada's only professional performance training programs for developmentally disabled artists. During the winter and spring of 2015, I worked with Les Muses to explore the complexities of their creative training, in particular how different cognitive styles and physicalities are supported and valued in the classroom. My interest in this process was two fold: a) to understand in what ways disability was being presented as aesthetically productive, and b) the kind of artistic legacies students from Les Muses are leaving in the Quebec performance industry. Using parts of my fieldwork, this article discusses in what ways Les Muses uses disability as a creatively meaningful tool in the classroom-- something of which I will deem the "atypique approah"--to ensure all students are participating in the fullest and most artistically engaging way possible. I choose the word "atypique" to reflect the current movement in Québec that is calling forth the important artistic value of cognitively and physically unconventional artists.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".