Bibliographic record
Abstract
Photo courtesy of Jeff Kostuik/Hemp Genetics International This year, CSSA and ASA are partnering with the Hemp Industries Association (HIA) and the University of Kentucky (UK) to host the 2017 HIA Conference in Lexington, KY, 8–11 September. The conference is themed “Share the Vision.” For the first time, the conference program will include concurrent tracks covering diverse topics in science, industry, and policy as related to the evolving industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) industry in the U.S. as well as a moderated session integrating topics and participants from all three perspectives. For complete information, please see: https://thehia.org/event-2535421. The conference begins Friday, 8 September with meetings and events for HIA members only and will include the annual business meeting and other association matters. An all-day hemp farming/processing tour will be provided to conference registrants on Saturday, 9 September. The tour begins with the UK agronomic science industrial hemp research field day at the Agricultural Experiment Station Spindletop Farm in Lexington where lunch will be served on-site. From there, the tour will proceed to a commercial farm in neighboring Clark County to witness large-scale hemp grain harvesting by a standard combine. The last tour stop will be at the Atalo Holdings hemp research campus, also in Clark County. Here participants will witness hemp processing activities as well as learn about hemp food and cannabinoid products, culminating with dinner on-site. Concurrent tracks will begin Sunday morning following a general session for all registrants and will conclude Monday afternoon. Science tracks include presentations on hemp science visions for the future, agronomic science, fiber science, economic science, and hemp food science (human and animal foods). Science-track presentations will focus on current U.S. research and define future research needs. Industry topics include industry vision for the future, industry-wide economics, production industry issues, fiber industry issues, and hemp food industry issues. The policy track will include policy visions for the future, phytocannabinoid policy, national and state-level policy, economics policy, and intellectual property policy as related to hemp genetics. There will also be concurrent scientific poster sessions in conjunction with general exhibitions in the exhibit hall. Members of CSSA and ASA who are involved in industrial hemp research are strongly encouraged to consider presenting posters of their work during these sessions. Hemp was a U.S. commodity crop into the early 20th century and for a brief period during World War II. All species and varieties of Cannabis became schedule 1 controlled substances after the passage of the Controlled Substances Act of 1971. At that time, all GRIN germplasm was destroyed. Hence, excepting feral growth in rural areas that were previously active in hemp production, there are no sources of the old varieties bred in the U.S. and known to be well adapted to local climates and latitudes. Nearly all commercially available varieties originate from the European Union, Canada, Australia, or China. Today, efforts in hemp research are growing rapidly across the U.S. Pilot research programs are provided for in the 2014 farm bill when supported by state-level legislation. All pilot research programs must be administered by either state departments of agriculture or universities. The state department of agriculture administers the entire program in a few states while in other states, individual universities are administering programs. Generally speaking, statewide programs administered by departments of agriculture are broader in scale and scope. This is due to federal requirements regarding the monitoring of and reporting for individual research locations. Program administration becomes more onerous as the number of locations increases. Additionally, many universities are averse to serving in what is essentially a regulatory role for research sites and activities not under their direct control. According to the HIA (http://bit.ly/2rFRqLX), 26 U.S. states have legislation in place providing for pilot research programs, with at least eight additional states considering legislation. Current U.S. research efforts are very diverse. Hemp exhibits strong photoperiodism. As such, the onset of reproductive growth will vary depending both on the latitudes of origin and current production, which will significantly affect yields and harvestability. Basic variety trials are necessary to define which of the currently available, imported varieties will provide economically viable yields while requiring minimum modifications to standard harvesting equipment. Plant breeding efforts are under way to produce lines that are regionally well adapted and high yielding. Molecular biologists are defining inherent genes of strong interest as well as candidate genes for modification. Agricultural engineers are studying the potential of hemp as a feedstock for biofuels and carbonaceous materials. Food and animal scientists are investigating hemp grain as source of nutrition. The pharmaceutical potential of phytocannabinoids is of very strong interest. The science of industrial hemp is in its infancy within the U.S. The 2017 HIA conference will be the best occasion to be exposed to current research efforts with this “new”’ crop as well as an excellent opportunity for networking to define new needs and directions. Consider this: How many opportunities do you get to work with essentially an “unknown” crop that possesses significant potential and has such deep cultural interest?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".