Partis autonomistes et indépendantistes : paradoxes et influence institutionnelle
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En s’appuyant sur l’approche néo-institutionnelle de la science politique, cet article analyse les effets des partis autonomistes ou indépendantistes sur l’évolution des institutions. Certaines règles favorisent-elles leur émergence ? Ces partis adaptent plutôt leurs stratégies afin de maximiser leurs résultats en fonction des ressources institutionnelles existantes telles le financement étatique, le mode de scrutin et les règles parlementaires de juridictions déjà autonome. Ils peuvent aussi avoir des effets structurants sur la configuration des systèmes politiques. Principalement à l’aide des cas québécois et canadien, cet article présente enfin des défis et des paradoxes posés par ces partis, soit le piège du bon gouvernement, la question de la double légitimité, le choix de s’institutionnaliser et l’influence de la société civile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it