MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2729399671 · doi:10.1109/ipdps.2017.122

The SEPO Model of Computation to Enable Larger-Than-Memory Hash Tables for GPU-Accelerated Big Data Analytics

2017· article· en· W2729399671 on OpenAlexaff
Reza Mokhtari, Michael Stumm

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHash tableHash functionParallel computingBig dataSpeedupAnalyticsDouble hashingDatabaseOperating systemProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The massive parallelism and high memory bandwidth of GPU's are particularly well matched with the exigencies of Big Data analytics applications, for which many independent computations and high data throughput are prevalent. These applications often produce (intermediary or final) results in the form of key-value (KV) pairs, and hash tables are particularly well-suited for storing these KV pairs in memory. How such hash tables are implemented on GPUs, however, has a large impact on performance. Unfortunately, all hash table solutions designed for GPUs to date have limitations that prevent acceleration for Big Data analytics applications. In this paper, we present the design and implementation of a GPU-based hash table for efficiently storing the KV pairs of Big Data analytics applications. The hash table is able to grow beyond the size of available GPU memory without excessive performance penalties. Central to our hash table design is the SEPO model of computation, where the processing of individual tasks is selectively postponed when processing is expected to be inefficient. A performance evaluation on seven GPU-based Big Data analytics applications, each processing several Gigabytes of input data, shows that our hash table allows the applications to achieve, on average, a speedup of 3.5 over their CPU-based multi-threaded implementations. This gain is realized despite having hash tables that grow up to four times larger than the size of available GPU memory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.419
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.201
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207