MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2729421725 · doi:10.5006/2501

<i> <b>Technical Note:</b> </i> Screening of Salt Fog Environments for Mg Alloy Stress Corrosion Cracking Susceptibility

2017· article· en· W2729421725 on OpenAlexaff
Brycklin Wilson, Joseph R. McDermid, J.R. Kish

Bibliographic record

VenueCORROSION · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityMcMaster University Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStress corrosion crackingAlloyMetallurgyCorrosionCrackingMaterials scienceStress (linguistics)Salt (chemistry)Composite materialChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

U-bend samples of Mg alloy AZ31B were subjected to continuous near-neutral salt fog exposure to evaluate the effect of a variable salt content on stress corrosion cracking (SCC) susceptibility. Using the ASTM B117 standard environment as a baseline (5 wt% NaCl (aq) at 35°C), a two order of magnitude reduction in NaCl content coincided with a change in the dominant corrosion mode from localized filament corrosion only to transgranular SCC only. An 11 d exposure period in the 0.05 wt% NaCl (aq) fog was sufficient to cause fracture by transgranular SCC. The resistance of the intact surface film and subsequent cathodically-activated enhanced hydrogen gas evolution likely were the critical factors controlling the transition of the dominant corrosion mode (from filament corrosion to SCC). Filament corrosion initiation likely required a Cl− ion-induced (i.e., chemical) break down of the intact film, whereas SCC likely required a stress-induced rupture (i.e., mechanical) break down of the intact film.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCORROSIONSame topicMagnesium Alloys: Properties and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207