MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2729460441 · doi:10.46525/ret.v26i3.213

Ministério presbiteral na Igreja

2016· article· pt· W2729460441 on OpenAlexaff
Luís Stadelmann

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Encontros Teológicos · 2016
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious and Theological Studies
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumo: O tema do artigo é desenvolvido em vários capítulos, começandocom o ministério eclesial pela análise dos termos-chave nos diferentes livrosdo NT e do uso nas citações na literatura patrística das primeiras décadas.Muito elucidativa sobre a vida dos bispos nos primórdios do cristianismo é aabordagem das sete Cartas no livro do Apocalipse. Uma característica marcanteé estudada no capítulo sobre a atividade dos presbíteros a serviço de Cristona Igreja. Realce especial merece a função dos presbíteros como oficiantesda celebração litúrgica da Eucaristia. O último capítulo mais extenso trata damissão das mulheres na pastoral vocacional diante do problema da escassezdos padres hoje em dia.Abstract: The article develops the basic theme in various chapters, beginningwith the semantic analysis of key words which occur in different books of theNT, dealing with the ecclesial dimension of the ministries in the Church. A quickglance at some of the earlier written sources of Christianity from the first decadesis quite revealing. Very interesting is the reference to the life of the bishops mentionedin the seven letters addressed to churches mentioned in the Apocalypse.The study of the priestly ministry at the service of Christ is quite important in theoverall presentation relevant features. Special attention is given to the functionof the priests officiating at the liturgical celebration of the Eucharist. The lastchapter is more extended due to the involvement of women in the pastoral activitydealing with the promotion and formation of vocations of future priests. Facingthe problem of a steady decrease in number of seminarians in the diocese andreligious orders new procedures should be devised to stop the shortage of clergyand raise the growth of new vocations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Encontros TeológicosSame topicReligious and Theological StudiesFrench-language works237,207