MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2729552381 · doi:10.1038/s41536-017-0026-z

A blueprint for the next generation of ELSI research, training, and outreach in regenerative medicine

2017· review· en· W2729552381 on OpenAlexafffund
Judy Illes, Douglas Sipp, Erika Kleiderman, Shelly Benjaminy, Rosario Isasi, Geoff Lomax, Zubin Master, Jennifer B. McCormick, Ubaka Ogbogu, Vardit Ravitsky, Julie M. Robillard, Fábio Rossi, Brenda J. Wilson, Amy Zarzeczny

Bibliographic record

Venuenpj Regenerative Medicine · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical Ethics and Regulation
Canadian institutionsOttawa Public HealthUniversity of OttawaUniversité de MontréalUniversity of AlbertaMcGill Genome CentreMcGill University Health CentreNeuroDevNetUniversity of ReginaMcGill UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of AlbertaStem Cell NetworkUniversity of OttawaCalifornia Institute of Regenerative MedicineCalifornia Institute for Regenerative Medicine
KeywordsBlueprintOutreachRegenerative medicineMedicinePsychologyNeuroscienceMedical educationStem cellEngineeringBiologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Regenerative medicine has attracted the interest of scientists, physicians, and patient communities, and as well as policy-makers and the broader public given related ethical, legal, and social implications. Here we examine past initiatives in the ethical, legal and social implications arena in regenerative medicine, and offer our views on actionable priorities for the future in six key areas: capacity building, policy, engagement with industry, resaerch ethics, communication, and community building.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.010
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.869
GPT teacher head0.585
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuenpj Regenerative MedicineSame topicBiomedical Ethics and RegulationFrench-language works237,207