Los bacalaos y el Tratado de Utrecht: un conflicto entre potencias con el peor desenlace
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolEl Tratado firmado en Utrecht en 1713 puso fin a la Guerra de Sucesion en Espana y abordo los intereses coloniales de Francia e Inglaterra en Ame rica del Norte. La explotacion pesquera de Terranova fue la excusa de las dos potencias para c ontrolar los accesos maritimos al corazon de la Nouvelle France (Canada), a traves del rio San Lore nzo. Desde el siglo XVI, las guerras en Europa afectaron crecientemente a Terranova, donde se desa rrollaba una pacifica pesqueria internacional. Espana participo activamente en ella hasta la prime ra mitad del siglo XVII euskaraUtrechten sinatutako tratatuak 1713an Espainiako Su zesio gerratea amaiarazi zuen eta Frantziak eta Ingalaterrak Ipar Ameriketan zituzten kolonia inter esei ekin zien. Ternuako arrantza esplotazioa izan zen bi potentzien aitzakia Nouvelle Franceko (Kanad a) bihotzerako itsasbideak kontrolatu ahal izateko San Lorenzo ibaian zehar. XVI. Mendetik aurrera Eur opako gerrateek. Gero eta eragin handiago izan zuten Ternuan, non nazioarteko arrantza baketsu bat zegoen. Espainiak aktiboki hartu zuen parte bertan XVII. mendeko lehen erdira arte EnglishThe Treaty signed in Utrecht in 1713 ended the War of Succession in Spain and addressed the colonial interests of France and England in North A merica. Newfoundland fisheries exploitation was the excuse for both powers to control maritime acce ss to the heart of New France (Canada), through the St. Lawrence River. Since the sixteenth century , wars in Europe increasingly affected Newfoundland, where a peaceful international fisher y was developing. Spain actively participates in it until the first half of the seventeenth century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".