MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2729723162 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.060502

Quasistatic internal magnetic field detected in the pseudogap phase of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Bi</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>Sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>CaCu</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>8</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> by muon spin relaxation

2018· article· lv· W2729723162 on OpenAlexafffund
Anand Pal, S. R. Dunsiger, K. Akintola, Alan Fang, Abdo Elhosary, M. Ishikado, Hiroshi Eisaki, J. E. Sonier

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2018
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchSimon Fraser University
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsPseudogapPhysicsCondensed matter physicsField (mathematics)MuonRelaxation (psychology)Order (exchange)Muon spin spectroscopySuperconductivityMagnetic fieldPhase (matter)Particle physicsQuantum mechanicsCuprateMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report muon spin relaxation ($\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{SR}$) measurements of optimally doped and overdoped ${\mathrm{Bi}}_{2+x}{\mathrm{Sr}}_{2\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{CaCu}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{8+\ensuremath{\delta}}$ single crystals that reveal the presence of a weak temperature-dependent quasistatic internal magnetic field of electronic origin in the superconducting and pseudogap (PG) phases. In both samples the internal magnetic field persists up to 160 K, but muon diffusion prevents following the evolution of the field to higher temperatures. We consider the evidence from our measurements in support of PG order parameter candidates, namely, electronic loop currents and magnetoelectric quadrupoles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.157

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0470.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207