Machine learning approaches to refining post-translational modification predictions and protein identifications from tandem mass spectrometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is the dominant approach for large-scale peptide sequencing in high-throughput proteomic profiling studies. The computational analysis of MS/MS spectra involves the identification of peptides from experimental spectra, especially those with post-translational modifications (PTMs), as well as the inference of protein composition based on the putative identified peptides. In this thesis, we tackled two major challenges associated with an MS/MS analysis: 1) the refinement of PTM predictions from MS/MS spectra and 2) the inference of protein composition based on peptide predictions. We proposed two PTM prediction refinement algorithms, PTM-Clust and its Bayesian nonparametric extension iPTMClust, and a protein identification algorithm, pro-HAP, that is based on a novel two-layer hierarchical clustering approach that leverages prior knowledge about protein function. Individually, we show that our two PTM refinement algorithms outperform the state-of-the-art algorithms and our protein identification algorithm performs at par with the state of the art. Collectively, as a demonstration of our end-to-end MS/MS computational analysis of a human chromatin protein complex study, we show that our analysis pipeline can find high confidence putative novel protein complex members. Moreover, it can provide valuable insights into the formation and regulation of protein complexes by detailing the specificity of different PTMs for the members in each complex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".