Construction de la notion d’« élève à besoins éducatifs particuliers » par de jeunes enseignants durant leur première année de pratique professionnelle : du sens individuel au sens collectif
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article montre comment de jeunes enseignants des écoles primaires donnent sens à la notion d’élève à besoins éducatifs particuliers durant leur première année d’enseignement dans une classe comprenant un tel élève. L’analyse de contenu a permis de mettre en évidence trois visions influant sur la manière de travailler avec ces élèves. La prégnance d’une vision individuelle et médicale, clairement de nature à faire obstacle à la scolarisation des élèves ayant des besoins éducatifs particuliers en classe ordinaire, renvoie au rôle que joue l’environnement scolaire dans l’identification et la construction des difficultés des élèves. L’analyse a également permis de montrer la construction progressive d’un sens collectif porté par l’établissement scolaire et/ou les personnes avec qui le jeune enseignant collabore.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".