MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Short-Term Lateral Response of a Buried Modular Polymer Stormwater Collection Structure to Compaction and Overburden Pressure

2017· article· en· W2729804288 on OpenAlexaff
R.W.I. Brachman, Jonathan Leblanc

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeotechnical engineeringCompactionGeologyOverburden pressureLateral earth pressureTerm (time)Overburden

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Results from full-scale physical experiments are reported to identify and quantify short-term lateral response around the perimeter of a modular polymer stormwater collection structure during backfilling and under applied vertical pressures equivalent to the maximum and maximum-factored burial depths. The physical simulation was such that lateral stresses developed in the side fill for stiff native trench conditions and the particular soil, compaction, and resulting lateral displacements of the side panels (i.e., soil-structure-compaction interaction). Two types of coarse-grained soil, two types of compaction, and two structure heights were examined. Tensile strains in edge PVC columns were induced by lateral bending from soil placement and lateral earth pressures. Of the conditions examined, rammer-compacted 19-mm poorly graded gravel resulted in the largest short-term edge column tensions (0.4%); however, even these values were 4.5 times smaller than the measured short-term PVC rupture strains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental EngineeringSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationFrench-language works237,207