MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2729899319 · doi:10.17516/1997-1370

Beyond the Polar Code: Enhancing Seafarer Safety along the Northern Sea Route

2017· article· en· W2729899319 on OpenAlexaff
Stefan Kirchner

Bibliographic record

VenueLaCRIS (University of Lapland) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaritime Navigation and Safety
Canadian institutionsInstitute on Governance
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolar codeArcticThe arcticSea iceShoreClimate changeBusinessArctic ice packChinaArctic sea ice declineEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental protectionMeteorologyOceanographyGeographyEngineeringDrift iceGeologyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate change has led to dramatic reductions in sea ice coverage in the Arctic, which in turn made shipping in the Arctic Ocean a reality.Also Antarctic marine tourism is increasingly relevant.At the same time, maritime travel in the Arctic and Antarctic oceans remains dangerous.On 1 January 2017, the Polar Code entered into force.In addition to numerous technical aspects, it also contains rules which address the so called "human factor" in shipping.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLaCRIS (University of Lapland)Same topicMaritime Navigation and SafetyFrench-language works237,207