La transition des individus par des épisodes de pauvreté : de l’ajustement de la consommation à la reconfiguration identitaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette recherche explore les stratégies d’ajustement de la consommation mises en oeuvre par les individus traversant des épisodes de pauvreté ainsi que les arrangements identitaires à l’oeuvre lors de ces transitions. Nos résultats montrent que ces individus déploient, outre les stratégies d’ajustement mobilisées par les consommateurs « durablement pauvres », des stratégies d’émancipation du marché reposant sur la résistance à la consommation et l’adoption de comportements déviants. Ces adaptations de la consommation se doublent d’accommodements identitaires permettant d’assurer une congruence du soi avec la situation précaire vécue. Enfin, des implications sont dressées en direction du marché, des pouvoirs publics et des organisations de la société civile en vue d’inclure ces consommateurs transitoirement pauvres.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".