MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2730031850

Inteligencia económica y Fuerzas Armadas: ¿una simbiosis necesaria?

2016· article· es· W2730031850 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Juan Mora Tebas

Bibliographic record

Venuebie3: Boletín IEEE · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDefense, Military, and Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Cold warPolitical scienceHumanitiesEconomic historyEconomyPoliticsHistoryArtLawEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

espanolLas guerras modernas han evolucionado, ya no se conquistan territorios…, se lucha por los mercados. En este contexto y, tras el fin de la guerra fria, muchos de los procedimientos y personal de los servicios de inteligencia militares fueron reorientados a los nuevos desafios de la guerra economica. Paises como EE.UU., Francia, Canada, e incluso Rusia, han ido incorporando sus Fuerzas Armadas a estas nuevas disciplinas de la Inteligencia Economica (IE). Pero …,?que esta sucediendo en Espana? EnglishModern wars have evolved, since they are not conquered territories…, but fighting for markets. In this context, and following the end of the cold War, many of procedures and personnel of the military intelligence services are being reorienting the new challenge of the economic War. Countries as USA, France, Canada, even Russia, have been incorporating their Armed Forces to these new Economic Intelligence fields. But…, what is happening in Spain?.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebie3: Boletín IEEESame topicDefense, Military, and Policy StudiesFrench-language works237,207