Extra- and intracranial blood flow regulation during the cold pressor test: influence of age
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We determined how the extra- and intracranial circulations respond to generalized sympathetic activation evoked by a cold pressor test (CPT) and whether this is affected by healthy aging. Ten young [23 ± 2 yr (means ± SD)] and nine older (66 ± 3 yr) individuals performed a 3-min CPT by immersing the left foot into 0.8 ± 0.3°C water. Common carotid artery (CCA) and internal carotid artery (ICA) diameter, velocity, and flow were simultaneously measured (duplex ultrasound) along with middle cerebral artery and posterior cerebral artery mean blood velocity (MCAv mean and PCAv mean ) and cardiorespiratory variables. The increases in heart rate (~6 beats/min) and mean arterial blood pressure (~14 mmHg) were similar in young and older groups during the CPT ( P < 0.01 vs. baseline). In the young group, the CPT elicited an ~5% increase in CCA diameter ( P < 0.01 vs. baseline) and a tendency for an increase in CCA flow (~12%, P = 0.08); in contrast, both diameter and flow remained unchanged in the older group. Although ICA diameter was not changed during the CPT in either group, ICA flow increased (~8%, P = 0.02) during the first minute of the CPT in both groups. Whereas the CPT elicited an increase in MCAv mean and PCAv mean in the young group (by ~20 and ~10%, respectively, P < 0.01 vs. baseline), these intracranial velocities were unchanged in the older group. Collectively, during the CPT, these findings suggest a differential mechanism(s) of regulation between the ICA compared with the CCA in young individuals and a blunting of the CCA and intracranial responses in older individuals. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Sympathetic activation evoked by a cold pressor test elicits heterogeneous extra- and intracranial blood vessel responses in young individuals that may serve an important protective role. The extra- and intracranial responses to the cold pressor test are blunted in older individuals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".