MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2730215999 · doi:10.30738/sosio.v2i1.486

MENGEMAS PESONA HERBAL DALAM PEMBELAJARAN IPA SEBAGAI UPAYA MENUMBUHKAN KESADARAN LINGKUNGAN

2017· article· en· W2730215999 on OpenAlexaff
Asri Widowati

Bibliographic record

VenueSOSIOHUMANIORA Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural and Biological Research
Canadian institutionsImmunoPrecise (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeautyPrestigeMedicinal herbsPsychologyAction (physics)SociologyArtTraditional medicineAestheticsPhilosophyMedicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Herbs are one of the natural wealth of Indonesia that has been used for generations. But unfortunately, the prestige is so legendary that the less there is a follow up. Not many young people who know the herbs and usefulness. This is due to the progress of society with owned facilities have come to globalizing mainstrem life in the 21st century, including the handling of health problems. Beauty of herbs need to be preserved because the longer it is already fading, and fear that the future will be lost. It can be anticipated by utilizing the "Beauty of Herbs" in science lessons. Learning science can do to help raise environmental awareness education to be able to face the challenges of the environmental crisis in the 21st century with "linking knowledge to action".Keywords: beauty of herbs, learning science, environment awareness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.102

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSOSIOHUMANIORA Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial dan HumanioraSame topicAgricultural and Biological ResearchFrench-language works237,207