Erosion monitoring during core overtopping using a laboratory model with digital image correlation and X-ray microcomputed tomography
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Core overtopping in embankment dams is an important phenomenon that may lead to contact erosion along the core–filter interface. This paper presents new experimental results regarding erosion mechanisms at the core–filter interface during core overtopping. The experimental results were obtained using a reduced-scale model with a variable upstream water level. Digital image correlation (DIC), microcomputed tomography (μCT), and sediment collection at the outlet were used to quantify erosion. Four experimental runs were conducted with a till core and different filters. Only one of the four filters satisfied the filter criteria that were applied. No contact erosion occurred during this test. For filters that did not respect the filter criteria, piping occurred within the core along the downstream slope when the water level reached the top of the core. As a result of the self-healing process within the core material, the erosion rate decayed with time as the hydraulic gradient increased. Results for DIC mainly reflected settlements within the filter due to erosion and a soil arching effect. The magnitude of the displacement vector obtained with DIC is directly proportional to the volume of till eroded. μCT showed that contact erosion occurred continuously.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it