MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2730600921

The hydrogen atom according to wave mechanics - II. paraboloidal coordinates

2017· article· es· W2730600921 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum and Classical Electrodynamics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrogen atomStark effectIsotropyParabolic coordinatesAmplitudeWave functionSchrödinger equationProlate spheroidal coordinatesElliptic coordinate systemBipolar coordinatesPhysicsLog-polar coordinatesCylindrical coordinate systemSeries (stratigraphy)Electric fieldAtom (system on chip)Classical mechanicsQuantum mechanicsMathematicsGeneralized coordinatesMathematical analysisSpherical coordinate systemComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the second of five parts in a series, the Schroedinger equation is solved in paraboloidal coordinates to yield amplitude functions that enable accurate plots of their surfaces to illustrate the variation of shapes and sizes with quantum numbers n1, n2, m, for comparison with the corresponding plots of amplitude functions in coordinates of other systems. A useful property of these functions in paraboloidal coordinates is their application to treat the Stark effect, when a hydrogen atom is placed in an isotropic electric field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0090.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it