Entre culture et barbarie, enchantement et désenchantement: Les boucs de Driss Chraïbi (1955)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le deuxieme roman de Driss Chraibi, Les Boucs (1955), devoile les dures conditions ou vivent les immigres maghrebins en France, dans les annees qui suivent la deuxieme guerre mondiale. A la suite d’une breve analyse de techniques narratives liees a un symbolisme puissant et souvent cauchemardesque, Cailler s’attache a etudier comment, dans le roman, enchantement et desenchantement – aux sens a la fois quotidiens et quasiment pathologiques – s’entremelent dans un reseau de visions parfois positives, plus souvent, negatives, sur l’environnement et les relations humaines. Il se pourrait que le processus de “barbarisation” depeint dans Les Boucs ne soit pas etranger aux milieux actuels de l’immigration en France et, plus generalement, en Europe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".