MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2730888497 · doi:10.53846/goediss-2923

Synchronization, Neuronal Excitability, and Information Flow in Networks of Neuronal Oscillators

2012· dissertation· en· W2730888497 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Christoph Kirst

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of California, San DiegoYork UniversityUniversity of PittsburghLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenRadboud UniversiteitPrinceton University
KeywordsSynchronization (alternating current)NeuroscienceAttractorNeurophysiologyBiological neural networkNetwork dynamicsComputer sciencePremovement neuronal activityPhysicsTopology (electrical circuits)MathematicsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Synchronization is an omnipresent phenomenon in the dynamics of complex neuronal networks, emerging between single neurons as the simultaneous generation of action potentials and on larger spatial scales in the collective oscillations of neuronal ensembles. Synchronized neuronal activity is connected to various brain functions, neuronal processing and coding but is also associated with brain diseases. Several regulatory mechanism in the brain act locally by changing the dynamical properties of individual neurons or their synaptic connections. Understanding how local properties affect or even control the collective synchronization dynamics thus may provide helpful insights for the study of e.g. pathological synchronization or information transmission in the brain. In this dissertation, we theoretically and experimentally study how local properties of neurons or groups of neurons affect network wide synchronization, dynamic grouping and information routing. First, we propose and derive a general model of pulse-coupled neuronal threshold units with a partial reset that captures the response of neurons to supra-threshold stimulation. We analytically show that this partial reset controls a sequence of desynchronizing bifurcations that destabilize synchronized groups of neurons in the collective network dynamics. Moreover, we develop a general mathematical formalism to study the phase space structure of pulse-coupled units with delayed interactions and reveal that the partial reset controls a novel type of bifurcation scenario from unstable attractor networks prevalent in units with delayed pulse-coupling to heteroclinic switching dynamics. Second, we show that the excitability type of neurons, i.e. their intrinsic characteristic dynamics of generating action potentials, can be changed dynamically. For the general class of conductance based neuron models we analytically derive the bifurcation structure of the neuronal excitability transition and show that it can be induced by a change in neuronal morphology or in leak conductance. Using dynamic patch clamp experiments we confirm the main theoretical predictions, including a qualitative change in the relation between input current to output spike rate, a transition from integration to resonance properties and a region of bistable dynamics. The results indicate that synaptic activity is sufficient to dynamically induce this neuronal excitability switch, thereby providing a flexible mechanism for the dynamic control of synchronization and grouping of neurons in the collective network dynamics. Third, we study the impact of local changes on the information flow in neuronal networks undergoing collective neuronal oscillations. For the general class of stochastic phase-reduced oscillator networks we derive expressions for the delayed mutual information between clusters as a function of the underlying network structure. We use this theory to reveal how information can be rerouted dynamically by switching between different dynamical states. In hierarchical clustered networks we further show how local changes within a group of neurons control the global inter-cluster information flow. Finally, we confirm these findings in a more biophysical realistic network model of spiking neurons undergoing collective gamma oscillations and extend the results to information transfer in the precisely timed spike patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeural dynamics and brain functionFrench-language works237,207