Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spiralian development is characterized by stereotypic cell geometry and spindle orientation in early cleavage stage embryos, as well as conservation of ultimate fates of descendent clones. Diverse taxa such as molluscs, annelids, flatworms, and nemerteans exhibit spiralian development, but it is a mystery how such a conserved developmental program gives rise to such diverse body plans. This review highlights examples of variation during early development among spiralians, emphasizing recent experimental studies in the annelid Capitella teleta Blake, Grassle and Eckelbarger, 2009. Intracellular fate mapping studies in C. teleta reveal that many of its cells’ fates are shared among spiralians, but it also has a novel origin for trunk mesoderm (3c and 3d micromeres). Studies have identified an inductive signal in spiralians that has “organizing activity” and that influences cell fates in the surrounding embryo. Capitella teleta also has an organizing activity; however, surprisingly, it is localized to a different cell, it signals at a different developmental stage, and likely utilizes a distinct molecular signaling pathway compared with that in molluscs. A model is presented to provide a mechanistic explanation of evolutionary changes in the cellular identity of the organizer. Detailed experimental investigations in spiralian embryos demonstrate variation in developmental features that may influence the evolution of novel forms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".