MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2730966425 · doi:10.1177/001458581204600201

Leopardi's and Beckett's Dianoetic Laugh: The Intermediate Space of Desire in the <i>Operette Morali</i> and <i>Krapp's Last Tape</i>

2012· article· en· W2730966425 on OpenAlex
Roberta Cauchi-Santoro

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueForum Italicum A Journal of Italian Studies · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSamuel Beckett and Modernism
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNothingLiteratureContext (archaeology)PhilosophySpace (punctuation)PoetryArtPsychoanalysisAestheticsHistoryPsychologyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The desire not to desire is crucial to Samuel Beckett's and Giacomo Leopardi's oeuvre. Beckett would delve at length into the ablation of desire in Proust, in which context Leopardi's poem “A Se Stesso” is quoted. Beckett catalogues Leopardi as one of the philosophers who proposed the only impossible solution — the removal of desire — to living. This apparently negative outlook in both authors has received critical attention. My contention, nonetheless, is that while both Leopardi and Beckett initially aspire to the nothingness that results out of the dissolution of desire, neither Leopardi nor Beckett are nihilists. It is through their humor that the two authors introduce a paradoxical intermediate space for desire, where the humorous moment simultaneously contains its repression and release. It is through the Leopardian and Beckettian dianoetic laugh, analyzed in the Operette Morali, Zibaldone di pensieri and Beckett's play Krapp's Last Tape, that this paradoxical desire is expressed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it