Enhancing clearing-based niching method using Delaunay Triangulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The interest in multi-modal optimization methods is increasing in the recent years since many of real-world optimization problems have multiple/many optima and decision makers prefer to find all of them. Multiple global/local peaks create difficulties for optimization algorithms. In this context, niching is well-known and widely used technique for finding multiple solutions in multi-modal optimization. One commonly used niching technique in evolutionary algorithms is the Clearing method. However, canonical clearing scheme reduces the exploration capacity of the evolutionary algorithms. In this paper, Delaunay Triangulation based Clearing (DT-Clearing) procedure is proposed to handle multi-modal optimizations more efficiently while preserving simplicity of canonical clearing approach. In DT-Clearing, cleared individuals are reallocated in the biggest empty spaces formed within the search space which are determined through Delaunay Triangulation. The reallocation of cleared individuals discourages wasting of the resources and allows better exploration of the landscape. The algorithm also uses an external memory, an archive of the explored niches, thus preventing the redundant visiting of the individuals, henceforth finding more solutions in lesser number of generations. The method is tested using multi-modal benchmark problems proposed for the IEEE CEC 2013, Special Session on Niching Methods for Multimodal Optimization. Our method obtains promising results in comparison with the canonical clearing and demonstrates to be a competitive niching algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".