MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A phase I study of enfortumab vedotin (ASG-22CE; ASG-22ME): Updated analysis of patients with metastatic urothelial cancer.

2017· article· en· W2731312174 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel P. Petrylak, Raymond P. Perez, Jingsong Zhang, David C. Smith, Joseph D. Ruether, Srikala S. Sridhar, Randeep Sangha, Joshua M. Lang, Elisabeth I. Heath, Jaime R. Merchan, Elaina M. Gartner, Rong Chu, Banmeet Anand, Fernando Doñate, Lynnae Jackson, Jeffrey A. Adams, Amal Melhem‐Bertrandt, Jonathan E. Rosenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineTolerabilityClinical endpointAdverse effectOncologyNauseaCancerGastroenterologyClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

106 Background: Enfortumab vedotin, an antibody–drug conjugate, delivers monomethyl auristatin E to tumors expressing Nectin-4, which is overexpressed in metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). Methods: This Phase I study (NCT02091999) enrolled patients (pts) with solid tumors, including pts with mUC, treated with ≥1 prior chemotherapy regimen. All pts received different dose levels of IV enfortumab vedotin (0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25 mg/kg) once weekly for 3 out of 4 wks. Nectin-4 expression was determined by IHC on archival tumor specimens and quantified by histochemical scoring (H-score). Primary endpoint was tolerability; secondary endpoint was antitumor activity assessed every 8 wks per RECIST v1.1. Results: As of 3 Jan 2017, 68 pts with mUC (46 M/22 F; median age, 67 yr [range: 41–84]) had been treated. Of these, 62% received ≥2 prior therapies in the metastatic setting and 40% had prior immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy. In these pts, Nectin-4 expression was high and prevalent (median H-score, 280 [range: 32–300]). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 58 pts (85%); diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and pruritus were TRAEs reported in ≥25% of pts. Most TRAEs were grade ≤2 in severity; 19 pts (28%) experienced a TRAE of grade ≥3. The most common grade ≥3 AEs (occurring in ≥5 pts), regardless of attribution to treatment, were urinary tract infection (10%) and hypophosphatemia (9%). No treatment-related deaths have occurred. Sixty pts had ≥1 post-baseline assessment. Antitumor activity was observed across the dose range; overall response rate (ORR) was 40% (95% CI: 27.6–53.5) for all evaluable pts (n = 60), 46% (95% CI: 25.6–67.2) in pts with prior CPI exposure (n = 24), and 44% (95% CI: 19.8–70.1) in pts with metastasis to the liver (n = 16). Complete responses were noted in 3 pts at doses ≥1 mg/kg. Median treatment duration was 26 wks (range: 5.1–64.6), median duration of response was 18 wks (95% CI: 8.4–40.1), and median progression-free survival was 17 wks (95% CI: 15.1–23.3). Study enrollment is ongoing. Conclusions: Enfortumab vedotin demonstrated a favorable tolerability profile with encouraging antitumor activity in heavily pretreated mUC, including pts for whom CPIs have failed. Clinical trial information: NCT02091999.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.508
Teacher spread0.384 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→