MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2731738193

An investigation of infrared spectral features related to the presence of lithium in micas, East Kemptville tin deposit, Nova Scotia

2017· article· en· W2731738193 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Travis G. Kendall

Bibliographic record

VenueSaint Mary's University Institutional Repository (Saint Mary's University) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaTinLithium (medication)GeologyNova (rocket)InfraredMineralogyMaterials scienceMetallurgyOpticsOceanographyPhysicsEngineeringPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lithium is an important commodity in the rapidly growing rechargeable battery industry and it is unclear whether future Li-demand will outgrow current supply. As such, it is important that the groundwork for exploration be ready in the event of a Li shortage. One possible source is within Li-micas in Sn-greisen deposits. The use of infrared spectroscopy, a cheap and portable technique, for Li-quantification within greisen-style mineralogy was explored. To do this, recreation of the 915 cm[superscript -1] signature, which was found to decrease in intensity as a function of octahedral Li occupancy after treatment of muscovite with molten LiNO[subscript 3] (White et al., 1961) was explored. Recreation of this feature was unsuccessful, which is likely due to a lack of empty octahedral positions to accommodate Li[superscript +] cations pre-treatment. The orientation of samples during analyses, both parallel and perpendicular to mica cleavage was found to have no effect on the wave number position of absorption features. Intensities o individual absorption features were found to vary as a function of sample thickness. In addition to this, the absorption features of 6 mica samples with varying Li concentration were compared. Absorption near 1411 and 2200 cm[superscript -1] were found to be shifted to higher wave numbers in samples with the highest Li, reflecting the replacement of octahedral Al by Li.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.354
Threshold uncertainty score0.713

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueSaint Mary's University Institutional Repository (Saint Mary's University)→Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→