Shale lithofacies modeling of the Bakken Formation in the Williston basin, North Dakota
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Bakken petroleum system (Devonian-Mississippian) in the Williston basin of North Dakota and Montana in the United States, and Saskatchewan and Manitoba in Canada is one of the largest unconventional oil plays in North America. The Bakken Formation consists of three members: upper, middle, and lower. Both upper and lower members are shale (source rocks), whereas the middle member (reservoir rock) is composed of mixed lithologies, including sandstone, dolostone, and limestone. Underlying the lower Bakken shale member, the Three Forks Formation is another target for hydrocarbon exploration.;Although the middle Bakken member along with the Three Forks Formation have been the targets for horizontal drilling and hydraulic stimulation throughout the basin, several uncertainties remain, including facies variation due to depositional and diagenetic controls on mineral composition and organic matter content in the Bakken shale members, which could play a significant role in hydrocarbon generation and production. Although the Bakken shale members may look homogeneous in the appearance, they are significantly heterogeneous and complex mixture of quartz, smectite, illite, carbonate, pyrite, and kerogen in varying proportions. Improved characterization of the Bakken shale lithofacies is important to better understand depositional environment, lithofacies distribution, and their potential influence on hydrocarbon production.;The main objective of this work is to investigate vertical and lateral heterogeneities of the Bakken shale lithofacies, based on mineralogy and organic matter richness. Secondly, if the Bakken shale members are composed of different lithofacies, can they be associated with different depositional and/or diagenetic conditions, which could influence source, transportation, and preservation of organic matter and sediment in the Williston basin.;Core data (such as X-ray diffraction, X-ray fluorescence, and Total Organic Carbon content), conventional borehole geophysical logs (such as gamma, resistivity, bulk density, neutron porosity, and photo-electric factor), and advanced petrophysical logs (such as Spectral Gamma and Pulsed Neutron Spectroscopy) are used and integrated together to classify the Bakken shale lithofacies and build models of lithofacies distribution at multiple scales. Usually there are minimal core data, scattered advanced well logs, and ubiquitous conventional well log suites in a petroliferous basin, which hinders lithofacies analysis and petrophysical modeling. Therefore, a significant effort of this work is geared towards developing and applying cost-effective mathematical algorithms (such as Support Vector Machine and Artificial Neural Network etc.) and geostatistical techniques (such as Sequential Indicator Simulation) to classify, predict, and interpolate shale lithofacies with high accuracy, using conventional well log-derived petrophysical parameters from several wells.;The results show that
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".