ANALISA PERAN KOMITE SEKOLAH DALAM PENINGKATAN MUTU PENDIDIKAN DI KECAMATAN BALIGE KABUPATEN TOBA SAMOSIR (STUDI KOMPARATIF SMA NEGERI 1 BALIGE DAN SMA NEGERI 2 BALIGE)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa bagaimana peran dari komite sekolah dalam meningkatankan mutu pendidikan di SMA negeri1 dan SMA negeri 2 di Kecamatan Balige. Pendekatan yang dilakukan dengan pendekatan kuantitatif, dengan populasi sebanyak 138 orang. Kemudian diambil sampel sebanyak 103 orang dengan tingkat random sampling yang terdiri dari semua pengurus komite, Pengurus OSIS, ketua MGMP dan orangtua pengurus OSIS. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan teknik kuisioner, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Data dianalisis dengan teknik analisis statistik deskriptif dengan menggunakan persentase, sedangkan pengujian hipotesis penelitian menggunakan uji F dan uji t yang diolah dengan program SPSS versi 20. Hasil penelitian menjelaskan Peran Komite Sekolah di SMA Negeri 2 Balige mempunyai rata-rata 167,21, yang jauh di atas rata-rata peran komite sekolah di SMA Negeri 1 Balige, yaitu 148.25. Sedangkan rata-rata Mutu Pendidikan di SMA Negeri 2 Balige adalah 172,48 yang juga lebih tinggi dari rata-rata mutu pendidikan di SMA Negeri 1 Balige yaitu 152,96.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".