ANALISA PERAN KOMITE SEKOLAH DALAM PENINGKATAN MUTU PENDIDIKAN DI KECAMATAN BALIGE KABUPATEN TOBA SAMOSIR (STUDI KOMPARATIF SMA NEGERI 1 BALIGE DAN SMA NEGERI 2 BALIGE)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa bagaimana peran dari komite sekolah dalam meningkatankan mutu pendidikan di SMA negeri1 dan SMA negeri 2 di Kecamatan Balige. Pendekatan yang dilakukan dengan pendekatan kuantitatif, dengan populasi sebanyak 138 orang. Kemudian diambil sampel sebanyak 103 orang dengan tingkat random sampling yang terdiri dari semua pengurus komite, Pengurus OSIS, ketua MGMP dan orangtua pengurus OSIS. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan teknik kuisioner, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Data dianalisis dengan teknik analisis statistik deskriptif dengan menggunakan persentase, sedangkan pengujian hipotesis penelitian menggunakan uji F dan uji t yang diolah dengan program SPSS versi 20. Hasil penelitian menjelaskan Peran Komite Sekolah di SMA Negeri 2 Balige mempunyai rata-rata 167,21, yang jauh di atas rata-rata peran komite sekolah di SMA Negeri 1 Balige, yaitu 148.25. Sedangkan rata-rata Mutu Pendidikan di SMA Negeri 2 Balige adalah 172,48 yang juga lebih tinggi dari rata-rata mutu pendidikan di SMA Negeri 1 Balige yaitu 152,96.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it