Integrated and Separated Logistics Management Study of Nigeria Bottling Company Plc and Nigeria Breweries Plc
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Firms are challenged in the decision in favour of the adoption of the separated or integrated logistics management programmes given the advantage of each. Hence this work surveyed the activities of the Nigeria Bottling Company Plc and the Nigeria brewery Plc, as firms in the different divides of these logistics management programmes based on the evaluation of firms’ annual accounts for the period 2000-2010 on the bases of the firms’ market share acquisition, profit earnings and shareholders’ welfare using the pearson correlation co-efficiency,‘t’ test statistics for difference of mean, spearman’s rank correlation co-efficiency as well as the likert ranking scale. Findings show that neither the separated or integrated logistics programme based firm has absolute rather comparative advantage over the other. Hence this work recommends discipline in the adoption of either programme for internal or external economy of scale benefits based of economy of scope benefits maximization. Keywords: Separated, integrated, logistics management, economy of scale and economy of scope.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it