Modal interactions and energy transfers in large-amplitude vibrations of functionally graded microcantilevers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modal interactions and internal energy transfers are investigated in the large-amplitude oscillations of a functionally graded microcantilever with an intermediate spring-support. Based on the Mori–Tanaka homogenization technique and the modified couple stress theory, the energy terms of the functionally graded microsystem (kinetic and size-dependent potential energies) are developed and dynamically balanced. Large-amplitude deformations, due to having one end free, are modeled taking into account curvature-related nonlinearities and assuming an inextensibility condition. The continuous model of the functionally graded microsystem is reduced, by means of the Galerkin method, yielding an inertial- and stiffness-wise nonlinear model. Numerical simulations on this highly nonlinear reduced-order model of the functionally graded microcantilever are performed using a continuation method; a possible case of modal interactions is determined by obtaining the natural frequencies of the microsystem. The nonlinear oscillations of the microcantilever are examined, and it is shown how the energy fed to the functionally graded microsystem (from the base excitation) is transferred between different modes of oscillation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".