MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

El no-lugar de la teoría literaria

2017· article· es· W2732137577 on OpenAlexaff
Eduardo Subirats

Bibliographic record

VenuePoligramas · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature, Culture, and Aesthetics
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En el siguiente documento se presenta un crítica a la cultura literaria contemporánea partiendo del análisis de la obra <em>O lugar da teoría literaria </em>(Andre Cechinel), en la que se plantea el mercado de la cultura como caso de " la servidumbre intelectual voluntaria", instaurada a partir de la auto-negación de la conciencia reflexiva. Todo lo anterior a partir tres obras ejemplares de la conciencia intelectual del siglo veinte: Molloy, Der Process y Pedro Páramo. Se centrará en la categoría subjetiva y ontológica de voluntad, teniendo en cuenta la voluntad artística como la esencia de la obra de arte. Así las cosas, la teoría, asunto central dentro de esta crítica, sería un devenir consciente de la voluntad artística de comprender y transformar el mundo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0130.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoligramasSame topicLiterature, Culture, and AestheticsFrench-language works237,207