Sensor and Dimensions Effects in Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Measurements in Mortar Specimens
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) method is a very popular technique used in Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) in Civil Engineering. Major benefit of the method is its simplicity. UPV uses the concept of measuring time of a first arrival of ultrasonic wave from one side of the specimen to another. Moreover, UPV is an ASTM standard test method for concrete specimens. The standard specifies the applications of UPV as: assessment of relative quality of concrete, presence of imperfections (i.e. voids, cracks, and the effectiveness of its repairs). UPV can be also applied to monitoring changes in the condition of a specimen. In spite of an easiness of the method the obtained results highly depend on the transducers used, the coupling quality, and the specimen dimensions. In this article the authors focus on the sensor and the dimensions effects. The results for UPV tests on 9 mortar specimens of different heights and diameters are presented. The specimens are tested with 54 kHz and 850 kHz resonant frequency (fc) transducers and the state-of-the-art laser vibrometer (response measurements). The authors discuss the laser vibrometer readings and the influence of specimens' dimensions on the measured pulse velocities. Practical recommendations for the minimal dimensions of the test object in order to minimize the error in the UPV tests are proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it