MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2732481134

A REVIEW OF BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE APPROACHES TO KEY BUSINESS FACTORS IN BANKING

2007· review· en· W2732481134 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Goran Radonić, Katarina Ćurko

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Knowledge Management and Practice · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBig Data and Business Intelligence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKey (lock)Business intelligenceBusinessBusiness ruleProcess managementCompetitive intelligenceKnowledge managementBanking industryNew business developmentBusiness activity monitoringCompetitive advantageRisk analysis (engineering)Computer scienceBusiness modelMarketingBusiness process modelingBusiness processAccountingComputer security
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Business Intelligence (BI) supports decision-making capabilities of banks and helps them to attain and maintain a competitive advantage in today’ s turbulent markets. Its usage makes the conditions, procedures and mechanisms for creating business knowledge. BI supports reaction to external pressures and enables effective risk management and implementation of regulatory compliances such as Basel II accord. The purpose of this paper is to outline BI techniques and their role in analysis of key business factors in banking industry

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.416
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.015 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Knowledge Management and PracticeSame topicBig Data and Business IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207