MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2732846998

Managing Large Fixed Costs in Vehicle Routing and Crew Scheduling Problems Solved by Column Generation

2005· article· en· W2732846998 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalGroup for Research in Decision Analysis
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColumn generationMathematical optimizationFixed costVehicle routing problemComputer scienceMinificationScheduling (production processes)Shortest path problemRouting (electronic design automation)Mathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We consider vehicle routing and crew scheduling problems that involve a lexicographic bi-level objective function (for instance, minimizing first the number of vehicles and second the operational costs) and can be solved by column generation where the subproblem is a resource constrained shortest path problem. Such problems are often modeled using a single-level objective function with a large fixed cost (weight) for ensuring the minimization of the primary objective. In this paper, we study the impact on the solution time of the fixed cost value. First, we present computational results which show that the solution time increases as the fixed cost value gets larger. Then, we develop an exact dynamic fixed cost procedure compatible with column generation that starts with a relatively small fixed cost value and increases it iteratively until optimality is reached. To prove optimality, a shortest path problem with resource constraints needs to be solved. Through a series of computational experiments on two types of problems, we show that this procedure can reduce solution times by up to 50% when compared to an approach relying on one very large fixed cost value. Column generation is a widely used solution method for addressing several types of vehicle routing and crew scheduling problems. In these problems, the objective has often two levels. For instance, at the first level, the number of resources required (e.g., vehicles) is minimized while the second level aims at minimizing the operational costs. Typically, for modeling a two-level objective, one uses a single objective function that is defined as the first objective value multiplied by a very large fixed cost plus the second objective value. Doing so, two difficulties can arise. Firstly, the hierarchy between the objectives might not be respected when the fixed cost is not large enough. Secondly, when this cost is too large, solution times required by a column generation method increase. In this paper, we address these two possible drawbacks by developing a simple procedure that is compatible with column generation. The proposed procedure guarantees optimality with regards to the hierarchy between the objectives and substantially reduces solution times when compared to a model using a very large fixed cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.392
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it