MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2732915859 · doi:10.21701/bolgeomin.128.1.003

Inventory, classification and genesis of the ground collapses in the groundwater body of the Western Mancha I

2017· article· en· W2732915859 on OpenAlexaff
K. Bórnez Mejías, Miguel Mejías Moreno, C. Camuñas Palencia, Jesús Del Pozo Tejado, Alejandra Rincón

Bibliographic record

VenueBOLETÍN GEOLÓGICO Y MINERO · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Architecture and Archaeology
Canadian institutionsBombardier (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroundwaterKarstHydrology (agriculture)GeologyAlluviumPhysical geographyGeomorphologyGeographyGeotechnical engineeringPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents one of the first detailed studies about the ground collapses that have taken place in recent years in the central area of the groundwater body of the Western Mancha I, in the province of Ciudad Real. The main source of the collapses is the breakdown of the roof of the karst cavities, as a result of a rapid and unusual increase in the groundwater due to the widespread and intense rainfall, such as those that took place in the wet period (2009-2013). This brought about a washing of the karstic system, the movement of water through sinks and preferential channels, which had been dry for decades, as well as the dissolution of the chalky material itself. This ascent phase of the groundwater was preceded by a steady decrease in the piezometric levels, caused by prolonged drought and over-exploitation through pumping. To obtain an optimum knowledge of the area of study, important research has been done to localize, measure, and classify each of the collapses. Along with this, we have compiled, expanded, and updated the data of the piezometry, to a high level of detail. We have been able to distinguish four types of ground collapses: alluvial collapses, collapses in areas of dolines, lagoon collapses, and intermediate types of collapses. It is also evident that with the passage of years, the collapses that have been produced are of lesser dimensions. Finally, we have deduced the areas which have a greater susceptibility for new collapses, in places such as the river Guadiana, the lagoon areas, and some areas of dolines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.198

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0080.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBOLETÍN GEOLÓGICO Y MINEROSame topicMedieval Architecture and ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207