MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2733163590 · doi:10.1063/1.4989836

Use of a bilayer lattice-matched AlInGaN barrier for improving the channel carrier confinement of enhancement-mode AlInGaN/GaN hetero-structure field-effect transistors

2017· article· en· W2733163590 on OpenAlexafffund
Hassan Rahbardar Mojaver, J. R. Gosselin, Pouya Valizadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsWurtzite crystal structureTransistorField-effect transistorCondensed matter physicsVoltagePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A quaternary lattice-matched layer structure based on employing a bilayer barrier for improving the carrier confinement in the channel of enhancement-mode metal-face c-plane wurtzite AlInGaN/GaN hetero-structure field effect transistors (HFETs) is for the first time proposed. Using the commercial self-consistent Poisson-Schrödinger solver Nextnano, electronic properties of the proposed hetero-structure, including the sheet charge density and carrier confinement on the GaN side of the hetero-interface, are evaluated. Based on these evaluations, it is shown that while the proposed layer structure substantially improves the carrier confinement in the GaN channel layer, it also upholds the merits of employing a lattice-matched barrier towards achieving an enhancement-mode operation (i.e., in the absence of the piezoelectric effect). According to these simulations, in terms of maintaining the required positive threshold-voltage for the enhancement-mode operation, it is also shown that the proposed layer structure substantially outperforms the quaternary AlInGaN/GaN HFETs employing a thin AlN spacer layer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.679

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicGaN-based semiconductor devices and materialsFrench-language works237,207