MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2733437095 · doi:10.1116/1.4991331

Interfacial reactions at Fe/topological insulator spin contacts

2017· article· en· W2733437095 on OpenAlexafffund
Sarmita Majumder, Karalee Jarvis, Sanjay K. Banerjee, K. L. Kavanagh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Nanotechnology and Microelectronics Materials Processing Measurement and Phenomena · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTopological Materials and Phenomena
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNational Institute on Minority Health and Health DisparitiesCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsTopological insulatorMaterials scienceSpintronicsCrystalliteTransmission electron microscopyFerromagnetismAlloyInsulator (electricity)Condensed matter physicsChemical engineeringNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors study the composition and abruptness of the interfacial layers that form during deposition and patterning of a ferromagnet, Fe on a topological insulator (TI), Bi2Se3, Bi2Te3, and SiOx/Bi2Te3. Such structures are potentially useful for spintronics. Cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy, including interfacial elemental mapping, confirms that Fe reacts with Bi2Se3 near room temperature, forming an abrupt 5 nm thick FeSe0.92 single crystalline binary phase, predominantly (001) oriented, with lattice fringe spacing of 0.55 nm. In contrast, Fe/Bi2Te3 forms a polycrystalline Fe/TI interfacial alloy that can be prevented by the addition of an evaporated SiOx separating Fe from the TI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Nanotechnology and Microelectronics Materials Processing Measurement and PhenomenaSame topicTopological Materials and PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207