MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2733536937 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.400021

Partager Des Modèles Xml : Quel Intérêt ?

2003· preprint· fr· W2733536937 on OpenAlexaff
Abderrazak Mkadmi, Marc Langlois, Nasreddine Bouhaï

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2003
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicMathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Canadian institutionsArmand Frappier Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceComputer sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apparu en réponse au besoin d’interaction et de coopération entre des systèmes d’information hétérogènes utilisant jusqu’alors des structures de données largement incompatibles entre elles, XML (Extensible Markup Language, langage de balisage extensible) a pour objectif de devenir le format privilégié de l’échange de documents – et plus généralement d’informations – en milieu ouvert.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.038
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.038
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0190.054
Open science0.0040.007
Research integrity0.0080.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicMathematics, Computing, and Information ProcessingFrench-language works237,207