MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2733603986 · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000001435

Expertise

2017· editorial· en· W2733603986 on OpenAlexaff
Franz H. Messerli, Louis Hofstetter, Enrico Agabiti‐Rosei, Michel Burnier, W.J. Elliott, Stanley S. Franklin, Tomasz Grodzicki, Kazuomi Kario, Sverre E. Kjeldsen, John B. Kostis, Stéphane Laurent, Frans H. H. Leenen, Per Lund‐Johansen, Giuseppe Mancia, Krzysztof Narkiewicz, Vasilios Papademetriou, Gianfranco Parati, Neil R Poulter, Josep Redón, Stefano F. Rimoldi, Luís M. Ruilope, Ernesto L. Schiffrin, Roland E. Schmieder, Allan B. Schwartz, Peter Sever, James R. Sowers, Jan A. Staessen, Ji‐Guang Wang, Michael A. Weber, Bryan Williams, Peter W. de Leeuw

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hypertension · 2017
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
FundersMedical Research CouncilNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

: Several sets of guidelines have been published recently and more are in the works. The very recent American College of Physicians/American Academy of Family Practitioners guidelines were put together by a set of authors and consultants without any expertise in the topic under discussion, that is, hypertension. Although we are not maintaining that all guidelines should be written exclusively by experts, complete lack of expertise among guideline authors is not acceptable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.058
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.058
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0090.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0790.052

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HypertensionSame topicBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesFrench-language works237,207