On the Relationship Between Donor/Acceptor Interface Energy Levels and Open‐Circuit Voltages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Energy offset ( E DA ) from a number of donor/acceptor heterojunctions is measured using ultraviolet photoemission spectroscopy. It is found that substrate work functions have little impact on the energy level alignments at donor/acceptor heterojunctions. Planar‐heterojunction organic photovoltaic cells are made to test the relationship between energy offset and open‐circuit voltage ( V OC ). V OC is found to increase linearly as a function of E DA . The V OC , however, takes a surprising turn at E DA = 1.5 eV and starts to decrease as a function of donor–acceptor energy levels. To explain this experimental observation, a theoretical model to quantify the relationship between V OC and E DA is developed. The proposed model well explains the experimental data and, in particular, the reverse trend of V OC on E DA . By grouping several material constants into one variable, a simple universal plot that well describes the experimental data for both planar‐heterojunction and bulk‐heterojunction cells is generated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".